 |
| |
Academic
Renewal Process
Report
to the Community No. 4 – October 2008
Stephen
McClatchie
Provost and Vice-President, Academic and Research
|
| |
| Update
on the Process |
Since
the last Report to the Community, the majority of the Working Groups’
consultations have taken place. The annual Teaching Day at the end of
August was devoted to academic renewal, with the Working Group Chairs
presenting an overview of their group’s progress and leading smaller
break-out groups of attendees before coming back together for an open
session. (Graduate Studies has been on a separate track; see below.)
On 20 September,
an Open Forum was held, with approximately 45 faculty and students present.
The format was similar to that of Teaching Day, although there were no
breakout groups. Instead, approximately 90 minutes of excellent discussion
followed an hour of updates from the Chairs. A SAC-organised series of
meetings with students occurred the following week. Despite the excellent
job done in advertising these meetings (including a series of provocative
questions for each), student attendance was not strong.
Throughout
this period, the Working Groups have continued to meet on an individual
basis and the Steering Committee has met three times. In addition, several
articles on the academic renewal process have appeared in The Argosy.
|
|
| Areas
of Emerging Consensus |
| While
it is risky at this point in the process to try to anticipate the recommendations
that will emerge from the Working Groups, it is possible to discern an emerging
consensus in a number of areas: |
| 1. |
The
current system of distribution requirements should be replaced with
one that is less prescriptive, more flexible, and tailored to individual
student’s needs. Many students and faculty members see some
sort of distribution requirement as essential to the Mount Allison
experience. |
| 2. |
There
is considerable enthusiasm for some sort of first-year seminar, ideally
focussed on one of the five areas of strategic emphasis in the Strategic
Statement (culture and creativity, environment, globalization and
its consequences, public service and citizenship, and science) and
embodying in a preliminary manner a significant number of the outcomes
desired of all Mount Allison degrees (see below). I would propose
that we offer such a seminar as a pilot next year and am prepared
to allocate a stipend or two to help make this happen. If you are
interested in proposing a topic, please let me or your Dean know. |
| 3. |
The
Outcomes and Literacies group has drafted a list of desired outcomes
for all Mount Allison graduates (See Appendix
1). This document has received broad consensus from the community,
including the support in principle of Faculty Council. These guiding
principles will now inform the work of the other groups and the Outcomes
group is now considering ways that they could be implemented. |
| 4. |
There
is strong support for allowing more challenges for credit and Academic
Matters will now give some thought to a policy in this area. |
| 5. |
There
is an openness to making more use of the beginning and ending of terms
for concentrated courses (which admittedly will not work in all areas).
There is also support for offering a limited number of evening classes.
We will pilot this next year by offering a section of at least one
multi-section course in the evening. |
| 6. |
The
consultative process has also revealed opposition to a number of proposals
(e.g., requiring all students to have a second language; requiring
a minor outside the Faculty of the major). These have now been dropped.
|
|
| As
the process moves from the abstract to the concrete (in terms of recommendations
and decisions), it will be essential to strike a balance between regulation
and deregulation in terms of program requirements. This has emerged as an
area of philosophical difference amongst participants. My own view is that
a more flexible system is better for students and faculty members alike.
|
|
| Graduate
Studies |
| The
Working Group on Graduate Studies has followed a slightly different process
and timeline from the other groups. This is largely because of the significant
external component to the debate: the province’s Action Plan for Post-Secondary
Education proposes the development of a provincial consortium for graduate
studies. The Steering Committee on Post-Secondary Research and Graduate
Studies (of which I am a member) has met recently and established a sub-committee
to outline the parameters of such a consortium. |
|
| Academic
Advising |
| The
need for a robust system of academic advising has come up repeatedly in
conversations and meetings over the past months. Deans’ Council
is currently reviewing the success of the pilot project established in
2007 and will be making recommendations for improvements for the 2009-10
academic year. An advertisement for the Academic Advising position in
Student Services will appear shortly. |
|
| Report
from Academic Matters |
| The
last Report to the Community included a report from the Academic Matters
Committee with proposals for a number of calendar changes. Please send
any comments about these proposals to the Chair of the Committee, Hans
vanderLeest. The Committee may move forward with several of these recommendations
this year (e.g., Joint Honours) in response to specific submissions from
Departments.
|
|
| Next
Steps |
| 1. |
The
Working Groups will conclude their consultations and draft their reports,
to be submitted by 15 November. |
| 2. |
The
next Report to the Community will appear shortly after the Working
Group reports are submitted on 15 November 2008. It will largely consist
of these reports. |
| 3. |
A short
consultation process will ensue, to be completed early in 2009. |
| 4. |
In the
meantime, the Provost and Vice-President, in consultation with the
Steering Committee, will develop a summative and more-directive document
to launch Phase II of the academic renewal process. |
| 5. |
Comments
or concerns about the process or any other aspect of academic renewal
may be given to any member of the Steering Committee. |
|
|
|
APPENDIX
1 - OUTCOMES AND LITERACIES DOCUMENT |
| Regardless
of their area of study, all Mount Allison graduates will be able to demonstrate
learning and achievement in the following four domains: |
- Effective
and Ethical Work Habits
- Scholarly
Knowledge & Methods
- Critical
& Creative Thinking
- Citizenship
& Engagement
|
| |
| 1.
Effective and Ethical Work Habits |
In
Work Habits
Mount Allison graduates will be able to: |
- Work independently
- Work collaboratively,
making meaningful contributions to group discussions and projects
- Submit
work in whose preparation they have taken care and pride, going beyond
the minimum requirements for the task
- Prioritize
study, work, and other responsibilities in order to fulfill obligations
honestly and punctually
|
| |
In
Ethics & Academic Integrity
Mount Allison graduates will be able to: |
- Demonstrate
diplomacy and civility in communication, recognizing that academic language
is often nuanced and discriminating
- Appropriately
apply ethics and standards associated with the discipline (e.g., research
ethics)
- Credit
all sources of data, samples, and information honestly and according
to the standards and conventions of the discipline
|
| |
| 2.
Scholarly Knowledge & Methods |
In
Subject/Content Knowledge:
Mount Allison graduates will be able to demonstrate: |
- Specific
disciplinary knowledge in Majors and Minors or Honours area, including
an awareness of how the literature of these disciplines is created
- Multi-disciplinary
knowledge from beyond areas of Honours, Majors, and Minors
- An appreciation
for the potentials of interplay and cross-pollination among disciplines
- Knowledge
of the world, including current events and an awareness of contemporary
applications of their learning
|
| |
In
Information Literacy & Research Skills
Mount Allison graduates will have developed information gathering habits
that will support life-long learning, including: |
- Locating
specific resources (according to instructions)
- Identifying
and using relevant information retrieval systems for their needs
- Choosing
relevant, appropriate resources independently
- Differentiating
between a generic search-engine web search and scholarly research
- Discriminating
among various sources
|
| |
In
Methods
Mount Allison graduates will be able to: |
- Produce
well-structured written work—thesis statement, well-designed paragraphs,
etc
- Present
clear oral presentations using spoken language appropriate for the audience
and the discipline
- Take effective
notes from written or spoken material
- Solve
problems using basic computational skills
- Apply
basic mathematical skills to perform everyday tasks, such as interest
rate calculation, unit conversion, or rough estimation
- Demonstrate
a facility with basic computer programs and software
- Use technology
thoughtfully and appropriately both to enhance their understanding of
subject content and to support their written or oral presentation of
academic work
- Apply
appropriate methodologies effectively (disciplinary, interdisciplinary,
scientific, mathematical, qualitative, quantitative, etc)
|
| |
| 3.
Critical and Creative Thinking |
In
Interpretation: Reading, Listening, Analyzing
Mount Allison graduates will be able to: |
- Demonstrate
comprehension of written material by interpreting, paraphrasing or summarizing
it
- Read,
understand and compare a variety of written materials or texts
- Understand
standard statistical language and interpret statistical data
- Identify
major points when listening to lectures and oral arguments
- Conduct
a comparative analysis, by making connections and highlighting differences
between a variety of texts, theories or approaches
- Identify
patterns in texts, data sets, visual materials, etc.
- Convert
units from one system of representation to another (e.g., from numbers
to words)
- Judge
the validity and value of sources
|
| |
In
Problem-Solving
Mount Allison graduates will have developed the intellectual curiosity
that leads to creative problem-solving and will be able to: |
- Identify
and prioritize significant issues, questions and problems
- Ask meaningful,
relevant questions whose answers are within reach
- Design
an appropriate research study or creative project
- Evaluate
the appropriateness of a problem-solving strategy or logical process
- Learn
from mistakes or disappointing/unexpected results
- See the
potential of one thing to be several others (creative thinking/abstract
thinking)
- Predict
results on the basis of data and assess their implications
|
| |
In
Critical Reflection
Mount Allison graduates will be able to: |
- Question
their own and others’ assumptions and theories
- Recognize
and differentiate among facts, assumptions, and commonly-held misconceptions
- Identify
and admit error and devise strategies for correction/improvement
- Reflect
on the learning process and understand their evolution as life-long
learners
|
| |
In
Logical Argumentation
Mount Allison graduates will be able to: |
- Use language
effectively to demonstrate their mastery of concepts
- Express
their ideas clearly, logically, and according to the conventions of
their area of study
- Develop
and defend a hierarchy of ideas
- Present
a logical argument using numerical data
- Follow
leads from one data set or source to another
- Demonstrate
mastery of inductive and deductive reasoning
- Provide
logical, convincing, and respectful arguments in defense of their conclusions
|
| |
| 4.
Citizenship & Engagement |
|
Building
on the bases of their achievement in Effective and Ethical Work Habits,
Scholarly Knowledge & Methods, and Critical & Creative Thinking,
Mount Allison graduates will make a difference in their world by:
|
| |
| Demonstrating
and articulating a human, global, and cultural sensitivity evidenced in |
- The ability
to communicate respectfully to and about others
- A respect
for difference
- An awareness
of the consequences and implications of their actions and words
- The application
of principles and theories to real-world contexts
- An awareness
of societal, national and international issues
- A spirit
of service
|
|
| Print
Version PDF |
|
| ©
Mount Allison University |
| |
October 31, 2008
|