|
| Policy
#: |
5310 |
| Subject: |
The
Evaluation of Teaching |
| Group: |
Institutional
|
| Approved
by: |
Senate |
| Approval
date: |
22 September
2009 |
| Effective
date: |
22 September
2009 |
| Revised: |
14 March 2012 |
| Administered
by: |
Provost
and Vice-President, Academic & Research |
|
|
| 1 - INTRODUCTION |
Just as scholarship
in one’s discipline requires reading, research, experimentation, presentation
of persuasive evidence, and response to critique, so does scholarly teaching
require reflection, research, innovation, on-going assessment, and evidence
of accomplishment. Mount Allison University is committed to excellence in
undergraduate teaching and learning and recognizes that a fair and robust
system of evaluation is essential to maintain the high quality of teaching
and curricula at the university.
In September 2006, the University Senate passed a resolution on teaching
evaluation. Though it has been widely implemented across the university,
that resolution has been hampered by a lack of clarity. It did not, for
example, specify that a particular evaluation form be used; therefore, various
forms and several approaches are currently used at Mount Allison, both paper
and online. Lack of consistency and standardization has led to some confusion
for both faculty and students.
|
| The university
remains committed to developing and implementing a system of teaching evaluation
that |
| a)
|
reflects
and supports both individual styles and disciplinary norms or standards;
and |
| b) |
combines
complementary evidence from a variety of sources: student ratings
of courses and instruction, peer review, and continuous self-assessment. |
|
| While making
reference to other sources of feedback, this policy will focus on Student
Evaluation of Teaching (SET). |
|
| 2.
GOALS |
| Evaluation
has several goals relating to the achievement, maintenance, and demonstration
of the highest quality of teaching at the university. Specifically, the
goals of this policy are the following: |
| a) |
To
articulate the underlying principles of course and teaching evaluation
as a means of |
| |
| i. |
encouraging
reflective teaching and continual improvement at Mount Allison,
|
| ii. |
demonstrating
that good teaching is valued and supported at the university,
and |
| iii. |
encouraging
a culture of transparency and accountability with respect to
the evaluation of teaching quality at the university; |
|
| b) |
To
recommend a teaching evaluation form for Mount Allison University
that includes both standardized questions and optional additions (See
Appendix A); |
| c) |
To recommend
procedures to be used in administering that form to acquire student
evaluation of courses and teaching (See
Appendix B); and |
| d) |
To
outline and describe the accountabilities of the various stakeholders
responsible for the conduct and administration of this policy. These
include the following internal stakeholders: current and prospective
students, professors, university administration. External stakeholders
include alumni, donors, funding agencies, MPHEC, and government. |
|
|
| |
| 3.
DEFINITION OF TERMS |
| Kinds of
Evaluation: The terms course evaluation and teaching evaluation, often
used interchangeably, are in fact different. Teaching evaluation includes
such items as the professor’s disciplinary knowledge, rapport, enthusiasm,
accessibility, fairness in assessment; course evaluation includes items
that may be beyond the teacher’s influence or responsibility: content,
textbook, classroom, schedule, etc. |
| |
| Purpose
of Evaluation: Evaluation may take place for two broad, and sometimes
overlapping, purposes: |
| |
Summative
evaluation: to make personnel decisions such as, hiring, tenure
and promotion, or teaching award decisions
Formative evaluation: to gather information designed to inform
practice or enhance quality.
|
| |
| Sources
of Evaluation: Evaluation data may come from a variety of sources, including
students, peers, and professors themselves. |
|
| |
| 4.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR STUDENT EVALUATION OF TEACHING |
| Implicit in
the September 2006 Senate resolution that all courses at Mount Allison be
evaluated is the expectation that every course at Mount Allison (including
continuous learning and spring session courses) will be evaluated each time
it is taught. The following principles inform the implementation of that
resolution: |
| |
| a) |
Teaching evaluation at Mount Allison University will be based on evidence
collected over time from a variety of sources. |
| b) |
Teaching
evaluation at Mount Allison is primarily formative; i.e., it is conducted
to provide individual faculty members with the information they require
to monitor, maintain, and develop the quality and effectiveness of
their teaching and their courses. |
| c) |
Teaching
evaluation at Mount Allison has summative applications; i.e., information
gathered from evaluation provides valuable evidence of accomplishment
in hiring, promoting, granting tenure, and adjudicating teaching awards. |
| d)
|
Evaluation
of teaching is multi-faceted, and student ratings are but one part;
they should be complemented by peer review, ongoing self-assessment,
and reflection. |
| e) |
Teaching
evaluation procedures at Mount Allison will be conducted in accordance
with the collective agreement between the University and the Mount
Allison Faculty Association (MAFA). |
| f) |
Teaching
evaluation procedures at Mount Allison will protect student anonymity
and confidentiality: students will not be required to provide their
signature, name, or student number. |
| g) |
The
integrity of the teaching evaluation process must be ensured and the
needs of the various stakeholders supported; therefore, a handbook
will be created to emphasize the importance of teaching evaluation
and to |
| |
| i) |
Provide information for professors on how to reflect on and
respond to evaluations to enhance their teaching and how to
record their accomplishments in a teaching portfolio; |
| ii) |
Educate students on the uses of teaching evaluations and help
them become better evaluators; and |
| iii) |
Help administrators interpret evaluations fairly and consistently. |
|
| h) |
To
ensure a productive learning environment, individual faculty members
are strongly encouraged to gather formative feedback during their
courses, using methods and sources of their own choice. |
| i) |
Best
practice in teaching evaluation involves using information and evidence
collected over several years and courses and from various sources—students,
peers, and self—and presented within context; therefore, faculty
members are strongly encouraged to compile a teaching portfolio that
records their development as teachers. |
|
|
| |
| 5.
IMPLEMENTATION |
The Evaluation
Form
Every course at Mount Allison University will be evaluated each time it
is taught using the standard Mount Allison Teaching Evaluation Form (See
Appendix A), which will contain |
| a) |
A statement of the purpose of teaching evaluation at Mount Allison; |
| b) |
Core
questions that will appear on every form; and |
| c) |
Optional
customized questions, chosen or created by the individual professor
to reflect the specific teaching and learning goals or context of
the course. |
|
| |
Evaluation
Procedure
Teaching Evaluation will normally take place within the last two weeks of
class, at a time and date deemed appropriate by the individual professor
(See Appendix B). |
| |
Special
Circumstances
While every course at Mount Allison must be evaluated, the standard university
evaluation form may not be appropriate for courses which involve individual
or independent study (e.g., research projects, studio or music courses).
In these special circumstances, other means may be used to obtain student
feedback, according to departmental or disciplinary custom. |
| |
Team-Taught
Courses
An evaluation will be conducted for each Mount Allison faculty member on
the teaching team. |
| |
Dissemination
of Data
Once compiled, and after final grades have been submitted, a report of the
numerically-scored questions will be returned to the individual faculty
member.
The written responses to the two open-ended questions (numbers 17 and 18
in the Recommended Teaching Evaluation Form in Appendix
A) will be returned to the individual faculty member with the numerical
report.
A procedure will be developed whereby faculty members can opt to grant others
access to their evaluation data. |
|
| |
| 6.
RESPONSIBILITIES |
| a) |
The Office of the Provost and Vice-President, Academic and Research,
is responsible for the administration of this policy. |
| b) |
The
Purdy Crawford Teaching Centre will |
| |
| i) |
to provide information about teaching evaluation, teaching portfolios,
and teaching enhancement; |
| ii) |
provide confidential services to support individual professors
in their on-going work to maintain the quality of teaching and
learning at the university; and |
|
|
| |
|
|
| APPENDIX
A:MOUNT ALLISON TEACHING EVALUATION FORM |
| APPENDIX
B:RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTERING TEACHING EVALUATIONS AT MOUNT
ALLISON UNIVERSITY |
| |
|