Date: Mon, 29 Aug 1994 15:34:59 +0500 (GMT+4:00) Subject: Top\op is a quasi-variety Date: Sat, 27 Aug 94 14:47:11 EDT From: Michael Barr by Michael Barr and M. Cristina Pedicchio We show that there is a certain variety (= category tripleable over sets) and a simple Horn sentence in it of the form phi(u) = phi(v) ==> psi(u) = psi(v) whose category of models is equivalent to the opposite of topological spaces. The theory consists of that of frames together with a unary operation we denote ' (it is a kind of pseudocomplement) satisfying a small set of equations plus an equation scheme that forces all intervals of the form [u /\ u',u \/ u'] to be complete atomic boolean algebras with the Sup and ' as operations. The underlying set functor on Top\op takes a space to the set of all pairs (U,A) where U is open and A is an arbitrary subset of U. The frame operations are the usual, while (U,A)' = (U,U - A). The Horn clause is u \/ u' \/ 1' = v \/ v' \/ 1' ==> u \/ u' = v \/ v'. [note from moderator: Michael says the paper will be available by ftp from triples.math.mcgill.ca soon.] Date: Fri, 2 Sep 1994 14:07:56 +0500 (GMT+4:00) Subject: Re: Top\op is a quasi-variety Date: Thu, 1 Sep 1994 17:24:13 +0200 (MET DST) From: Paul Johnson Dear Categories: > by Michael Barr and M. Cristina Pedicchio > > We show that there is a certain variety (= category tripleable over > sets) and a simple Horn sentence in it of the form phi(u) = phi(v) ==> > psi(u) = psi(v) whose category of models is equivalent to the opposite > of topological spaces. There is a related result which (since it makes no mention of Horn clauses, this result of Barr and Pedicchio apparently extends, yet, nonetheless) may be of interest: For each topological space B, the contravariant hom-functor Top(-,B) : Top^op -----> Sets is of descent type, if and only if, the space B contains a two-point indiscrete subspace, that is, a pair of points which in the topology on B are contained in the same open sets, and a copy of the Sierpinski space. The first condition is sufficient to ensure that, for each topological space X, the canonical counit map X -----> B^Top(X,B) is an injection, and the second ensures that it is the embedding of a subspace. That these conditions are each necessary is easily checked. Each such space gives rise to an algebraic theory Th_B, as well as a comparison Top^op -----> B-Alg, exhibiting Top^op as a full reflective subcategory of, and hence tripleable over, the category of algebras B-Alg. > The theory consists of that of frames together > with a unary operation we denote ' (it is a kind of pseudocomplement) > satisfying a small set of equations plus an equation scheme that forces > all intervals of the form [u /\ u',u \/ u'] to be complete atomic > boolean algebras with the Sup and ' as operations. The underlying set > functor on Top\op takes a space to the set of all pairs (U,A) where U is > open and A is an arbitrary subset of U. The frame operations are the > usual, while (U,A)' = (U,U - A). This particular algebraic theory to which you refer is perhaps exactly that arising from the space B having three points, one of which is closed, with open complement (containing the other two points) as the only non-trivial open. >The Horn clause is u \/ u' \/ 1' = v > \/ v' \/ 1' ==> u \/ u' = v \/ v'. > > [note from moderator: Michael says the paper will be available by ftp from > triples.math.mcgill.ca soon.] Best regards to all (especially FEJL), Paul.